a share of Key West’s increasingly
competitive retail/service
trade; and

• Expanding economic
opportunities and training
for Key West’s homeless and
needy residents to help break
the cycle of poverty.

As these goals clearly show,
it was the intent of both
the Navy and the city for a
large part of the transferred
property to directly benefit
Bahama Village, its residents
and others in our community
who are struggling.

In thinking about water
parks in general, we question
the mayor’s rationale, and
are curious to see the results
of the study he says is being
conducted to gauge the merits
of such an attraction in Key
West. A brief Internet search
shows the top 10 water parks
in America are in landlocked
cities, with very few water
parks located on the coast.
We also question the simple
matter of having enough land
to support a successful water
park. Most major water parks
cover upward of 50 acres
— Key West has a fraction of
that available. There is also
the question of water supply
and use. Water parks have
enormous water demands,
and with the city facing permanent
water restrictions, we
must ask if this is the best use
of resources.

Some residents have sug
gested — in jest — that the
mayor’s water park concept
be merged with an idea
fielded awhile back by County
Commission candidate
Sloan Bashinsky — a clothing-
optional pirate-themed
park on Wisteria Island. If the
city built a nude water park
on Wisteria Island, it surely
would have the only one of
its kind and easily attract
national attention and a
niche market.

Seriously, though, it’s time
to make some progress on the
Truman Waterfront property
and follow the plans that have
been in place for many years
now — plans that were established
through years of study
and negotiation, and that
have been publicly vetted.
We urge the city to assist the
BCCLT in moving its project
forward so the entire community
can all reap the benefits
for years to come.